Forumske priče: Buroj Ozone City (B-ozon grad), govno Bakira-šeik Izetbegovića u sarajevskoj izvorskoj vodi

Novi “čuvari” Bosne – prodaju golu zemlju arapskim šeicima, za sitne pare, kao da su je nasljedili od babe, kao svoju vlastitu prćiju !? O tome se uglavnom šuti, akademski sloj građana BiH učestvuju u silovanju prirodnih resursa, naučnici-prirodnjaci imaju preća posla od brige za svoja životna oprjedjeljenja u struci, mediji služe kapitalu i tajkunima… narod bleji, uglavnom.

Forumaši laju, šeici prolaze:


Bakir-šeikov srebreni soko od 10 kila: dobio ga Bakir-šeik Izetbegović na poklon od Ahmed bin-Sheika, a Ahmed bin-Sheik od Bakir-šeika dobio na poklon babinu prćiju, planinu Treskavicu !

Bakir-šeikov srebreni soko od 10 kila: dobio ga Bakir-šeik Izetbegović na poklon od Ahmed bin-Sheika, a Ahmed bin-Sheik od Bakir-šeika dobio na poklon babinu prćiju, planinu Treskavicu ! A iza dva šeika, na slici, rijeka Una, svjetski biser među rijekama – a da mu Bakir-šeik ne pokloni i Unu, da nije mojih krajišnika da mu spiće “protu-kolac” u prkno !

Forum Klix.ba
Board index > Opšte/opće diskusije > Priroda i ekologija >

> Re: Sve spremno za početak gradnje Buroj Ozone Cityja: Žičara će povezivati turistički grad s Bjelašnicom

Re: Santasa

Post 24/09/2016 23:41

Bumerang wrote: Znaci pocelo je, po mom misljenju ovo ce biti fantasticno naselje i od velike dobiti za Sarajevo i okolinu kao i za jos vece privlacenje turizma i sa njim sve ostalp sto slijedi🙂

Sta vi na ovu temu mislite dragi forumasi?

Ja mislim da je ovo tvoje mišljenje veoma loše, da budem blag !

Na osnovu kojih to informacija ti postavljaš ovo svoje mišljenje ? Vidio si ovu smješnu grafiku i čuo lupetanje polupismenog načelnika-siledžije Berila ?
Šta ti stvarno znaš o ovom pothvatu ?

Ako ovo nije kriminal prema prirodnom nasljeđu BiH, gradu Sarajevu i vodozaštitnoj zoni Treskavice, nacionalnom parku koji nikad neče biti proglašen zbog ovakvih pohlepnika, i na kraju prema sirotinji ove zemlje, ja ne znam šta jeste.
To je otprilike moje mišljenje, ali vrijedi napisati još par redova.

Umjesto authtonih bukve, graba i hrasta, Arapi će nam posaditi palme na dinarskoj planini izuzetne prirodne vrijednosti i ljepote, a naša će treskavička voda, koja se danas vidi u prirodnim vrelima u prirodnom okruženju, završiti u njihovim betonskim fontanama i bazenima. Ja ga jebem kome to treba i kome je to ljepota.
Šta reči o arhitekturi – umjesto naše orginalne dinarske-planinske arhitekture dobićemo kopiju jednog od pustinjskih ljetovališta !

Ne vidite ništa neobično u tom bezukusu, da ne kažem nakazno ?! Savaka čast !

U netaknutoj prirodi, u srcu bh. dinarida, uništićemo turistički potencijal koji ishodi iz neosporne ljepote, (donekle) sačuvanog tradicionalnog načina života, ukusu u gradnji, itd.
U netaknutoj prirodi Treskavice glupi Bošnjo će dovesti Arapa da mu pravi robnu kuću – na Treskavici !?!?
Ne može svega 20 kilometara dalje od ove očuvane prirodne cjeline, bliže urbanom širem području Sarajeva, nego baš u samom njenom srcu ?
To može samo neko ko ne cijeni ovu zemlju, ljude u njoj, ko je vidi kao plijen i svoju prćiju, za koju ne daje ni pišljiva boba !

Ja ga okrenem s leđa ko u ovom vidi išta dobro i lijepo, a da nije u talu ili na neki drugi način “dobar”. Doduše večna nas je tek prije generaciju dvije pobjegla od/iz šume pa mislimo da nema ništa ljepše od betona, ili bar mislimo da je pametno reči da je u betonu i asfaltu ljepota. Brkamo pojmove: pravimo se građanima, šta ćeš urbani smo, pa nam grad za 50 hiljada arapskih bogataša, sve sa robnim kućama i četverospratnim neboderima, u sred zamišljenog nacionalnog parka uopšte ne predstavlja silovanje bosanskohercegovačkog prirodnog nasljeđa, a boga mi i turističkog potencijala, koji je potencijal samo dok o njemu odlučuju ljudi koji u ovoj nesretnoj, razumom i pameću osiromašenoj, etno-religijski podjeljenoj zemlji, ne vide plijen koji treba što prije rasprodati i unovčiti u korist svoji porodičnih klanova i stranačke elite.

Dok god advokati i polupismeni političari i načelnici opština odlučuju šta će se graditi na Treskavici, kako, i kome ili ćemu će služiti, to je kataklizma, rogobatna i apokaliptična ujdurma neo-begovskih klanova i feudalaca.

Dok god se ne pitaju urbanisti, arhitekti, doktori nauka iz oblasti geologije, geografije, biologije, šumarstva, hidrologije, ekologije, turizma, sve te silne milijarde mogu samo raditi na štetu ove zemlje i običnog naroda, sirotinjske večine.

Šta ćeš, u ovoj zemlji glupana normalno je da čitave gradove oblikuju polupismeni advokati i političari, u slobodnom vremenu kad se ne bave “politikom”. Ako si dogur’o do glavnog odbora SDA onda nema razloga da se ne baviš i urbanizmom i ekologijom i turizmom, iako si jedva završio srednju metakoglodačku, a onda dobio diplomu s političkih nauka iz neke ublehaške oblasti “sigurnosti i mirovnih studija”.

Ja sam ranjen na toj jebenoj Treskavici, nakon što sam proveo zimu u njenim rovovima zalio sam je vlastitom krvlju, nije bilo mnogo, možda jedno 3-4 decilitra, ali je sigurno bilo više od količine koju je prolio po njoj Babin isprdak Bakir, kojeg nisam vidio među svojim ratnim drugovima, a koji su, ako su preživili tu zimu na Treskavici, danas uglavnom sirotinja. Pa se pitam: ko mu je dao pravo da prodaje Treskavicu kao da je njegova prćija ?!?!
Pa još da se na njoj pravi privatni grad za njegove jarane milijardere – a u koji ako ikad budeš dobio dopuštenje da uđeš preko kapije, ja ću ti u njemu kupiti jednu vilu !!!

Polažem nade da će neko nači načina da zaustavi prodaju “gole zemlje” – pa to je dno-dna. To je da povratiš !
Pa to ne rade ni afrički generalisimusi što hodaju s kalašom i crnim rejbankam čitav život (koji obićno bude skračen ritualnim ubistvom za koje je odgovoran konkurent iz drugog klana ili plemena), u svojim banana-republikama koje mjenjaju imena svakih 10 godina, dole u “najcrnjem” srcu afrike ili Kariba.
Pa ni oni ne prodaju zemlju jer znaju da u toj zemlji ima nešto vrijedno, makar dijamanti da se povade i prodaju. U našoj treskavičkoj je zaliha vode koja je nepresušna jer se konstantno obnavlja – kome će te se žaliti kad je zapišaju Arapi, k’o što su je zapišali neo-begovi na Bjelašnici i Igmanu, pa nakon 5,5 miliona godina voda iz vrela Bosne izlazi otrovna ?
To vam dođe na kraju, nakon što se sve rasproda ostaje “gola zemlja”, + lokalno roblje, koje će čistiti govna iz bogataških hala.

Ko misli da je to dobro, dobar u glavi nije !

Danas, tek možda 500 metara ispod platoa budućeg grada, koji će se kititi vještačkim parkovima sa neprikladnom stranom hortikultourom, palmama, betonskim fontanam i bazenima, stoji kompleks vrela Husremovac. Ovu ljepotu, koju nam je dao bog/priroda, zapišavaće budući strani stanovnici najidijotskijeg projekta u historiji Balkana i Evrope.

Udri sad betonom Bošnjo, što da stoji vako netaknuto, izbetoniraj ga, Bošnjo, biće ljepše i okruglije, a vodu pošalji u cijev pa u arapske fontane u B-ozon grad, nabijem te…

 

Slobodna Bosna, maj 2016: Berilo (po ko zna koji put) promjenio stranački dres
Ibro Berilo, vječiti načelnik Općine Trnovo - promjenio sve stranke SBiH, SDA, SDP, DF, SDA-SBB

Ibro Berilo, vječiti načelnik Općine Trnovo – promjenio sve stranke: SBiH, SDA, SDP, DF, SDA-SBB

Kako nezvanično saznajemo, načelnik Trnova Ibro Berilo pred predstojeće lokalne izbore ponovo je promijenio stranački dres.
Navodno, na sastanku sa potpredsjednikom SDA Asimom Sarajlićem održanom prije tri dana, Berilo je „obnovio“ članstvo u toj stranci ispred koje će se ponovo kandidovati za mjesto načelnika Općine Trnovo.
Kako je članovima Općinskog odbora SDA Trnovo prenio predsjednik Avdo Vatrić, sa Berilom je postignut dogovor za njegov prelazak u SDA i kandidaturu na predstojećim izborima.
Međutim, Berilo sa sobom namjerava „povući“ svoje saradnike, grupu od desetak ljudi, kojima se u SDA mora naći mjesta. Po svemu sudeći, dugogodišnji članovi SDA u Općinskom odboru stranke, morat će ustupiti mjesto Berilovim „pratiocima“.
Podsjećanja radi, Ibro Berilo u svoja tri načelnička mandata uspio je promijeniti nekoliko stranačkih dresova. Bio je u Stranci za BiH, zatim u SDA, pokušavao se priključiti SBB-u Fahrudina Radončića, a posljednji mandat 2012. godine dobio je kao kandidat SDP-a. Nakon toga, krajem 2014. godine Berilo postaje član DF-a, a nakon izlaska ove stranke iz vlasti, povratak u SDA logičan je potez načelnika preletača (prevrtanera) Ibre Berila. – M.F.

Re: Santasa

Post 25/09/2016 15:35

Grean wrote: Nacelnik rece da ovo nema veze sa slivom Crne rijeke koja je predvidjena za vodosnadbijevanje Sarajeva i da uopste nece ugroziti taj dio.
vjerujem da si bolje upucen od mene pa ga mozes demantovati ako je to laz. Investicija je srasna, ne bi je odbila ni jaca evropska zemlja ali treba znati sta time dobijamo a sta gubimo. Ja iskreno nisam kompetentan da govorim o ekologiji tog prostora samo znam da su 4,5 milijarde goleme (5,1 milijardu dolara smo dobili za obnovu zemlje nakon rata, onako za poredjenje a te tri godine dok su se te pare trosile zivjelo se prilicno dobro u BiH).

Ugroziće Bijelu Rijeku, koja je samo mali, nadzemni dio treskavičkog akvatorija !
Crna Rijeka je na jahorinskoj strani i stvarno nema veze, ali niko i ne misli na nju. Sva voda pod treskavicom skuplja se pod platoom budućeg “ludila” (B-ozon grada).

Ja nisam ekolog, ja sam građevinac. Priroda je moja strast, a možda  bi se bavio i njenom zaštitom, bar kao hobijem, samo da sam malo manje lijen i malo manje demotivisan, prvo državom koja je pretvorena u plijen i feud, a onda i društvom koje se guši u poremećenim vrijednostima.
Siguran sam da nijedna evropska zemlja ne bi odbila silne milijarde, ali nijedna ne bi dozvolila (ne bi joj ni palo na pamet) izgradnju čitavog grada tamo gdje mu mjesto nije, pa ga još nazvala ekološkim, a sve pored ovolikog urbaniziranog prostora u dolini Miljacke i Sarajevskog Polja – e to mogu tvrditi iz perspektive moje struke.
Graditi grad u srcu netaknute prirode, kad se može cijeli napraviti u Sarajevu (recimo od Čengić Vile do Rajlovca je sve u urbanističkom smislu devastiran prostor koji vapi za uređenjem), pa da bogati turisti na treskavicu idu autobusima za 20 minuta.
Ne kod Bošnje je pametnije uništiti to što vrijedi tako što će se betonom ući u največi akvatorij u dinaridima, i naljepši i najočuvaniji dio prirodnog nasljeđa BiH.

Ja napisah da je ovo najidijotskiji projekat u historiji Balkana i Evrope i stojim pri tom, stojim i pri tom da će ove milijarde donijeti štetu ovoj zemlji i narodu, i bio bih spreman da garantujem životom da ni u jednoj evropskoj zemlji ovo ne bi prošlo – pa jebo te, na Kosovu ovo nije prošlo jer Albanci-Kosovari nisu želili da im u budućem Nacionalnom parku neko pravi privatni grad za 50 hiljada stanovnika!
Kosovo ih je odbilo i prošle i ove godine.

Urbanističko rješenje Buroj Ozon na platou Treskavice - zločin silovanja prirodnog nasljeđa BiH, u kojem, osim birokratskih službi, učestvuju i akademski slojevi bh. društva. Stidite se kurčevi bh. urbanisti i kurčevi arhitekti, kurčevi ekolozi i kurčevi prirodnjaci - osim vas koji učestvujete, vi ostali svi šutite !

Urbanističko rješenje Buroj Ozon na platou Treskavice – zločin silovanja prirodnog nasljeđa BiH, u kojem, osim birokratskih službi, učestvuju i akademski slojevi bh. društva. Stidite se kurčevi bh. urbanisti i kurčevi arhitekti, kurčevi ekolozi i kurčevi prirodnjaci – osim vas koji učestvujete, vi ostali svi šutite !

Re: Santasa

Post 05/10/2016 00:31

Bumerang wrote: @ Santasa,

Hvala ti na pametnom i interesantnom pogledu u vezi izgradnje Ozone turistickog naselja. Gledajuci sa tvoje strane i uzimajuci u obzir da si ti u pravu slazem se sa vecinom ovoga sto si napisao. Medjutim je ne mogu ni tebi a ni politicarima vjerovati bez uvida u dokumentacije procedura i dozvola koje se moraju proci da bi se to naselje moglo graditi.

Potpuno si upravu !
Ovakve se stvari procjenjuju i analiziraju nakon što imaš u vidu sve ili večinu informacija i podataka – ali to isto vrijedi i za odobravanje, tj. nije razumno odobravati i radovati se nečem ovakvom bez tih podataka.

Međutim, mnoge stvari su jasne u vezi ovog projekta i bez uvida u detalje iz dokumentacije.
Naprimjer, jedna od njih, a prije svih drugih, je i sama ideja gradnje čitavog grada u području Nacionalnog parka (za koji je skupocjena studija, oko 3 miliona KM, završena još davne 2006 godine, a koji nije proglašen upravo zbog rovarenja po Igmanu i Bjelašnici, i planova za slično rovarenje po Treskavici, a koje je na djelu).
Ne treba biti posebno upoznat sa podacima iz dokumentacije i da se barem pretpostavi kako se gradovi ne grade u netaknutoj prirodi jedne netaknute planine, nego se grade u područijima predviđenim za urbanizaciju urbanističkim i regilacijskim planovima, gdje, između ostalog, postoji i infrastruktura (kanalizacijska mreža, npr.) koja može podnijeti sav teret grada od 50 hiljada – npr. grad se gradi u nastavku nekog sarajevskog naselja, ili u najgorem slučaju u produžetku kakvog manjeg mjesta u podnožju planine, poput Hadžića, Pazarića, ili čak Trnova ali baš na mjestu Trnova ili njegovom produžetku, ne negdje u opštin, itd.

Bumerang wrote: @ Santasa,
Gledali smo na televiziji program u kojem su bili gosti odgovorni za taj projekat i pribavljanje sve moguce ekoloske, geodetske, gradzevinske i druge dokumentacije.

Nemojte sad da se baš pravimo naivni – da li je u ovakvoj zemlji ovakvim ljudima zaista problem pribaviti sve potrebne “dozvole” ?!
U ovoj se zemlji izdaju okolišne (ekološke) dozvole politički podobnim tajkunima kao listovi tariguza. (Ti ćeš srati i zapišavati po Neretvi ? Koliko ti treba okolišnih listova tariguza ?).
Pa ovdje su izdane ekološke dozvole za projekte koji su osmišljeni za vrijeme Austro-Ugarske, a ideje razrađene još ’30-tih, a projekti završeni dalekih ’50-ih, pobogu, i sad kada se radovi izvode o njima se govori kao da su ekološki prihvatljivi po današnjim standardima – mislim na HES “Gornji Horizonti”, još jedan apokaliptičan projekat iz mafijaško-političke kuhinje ove sluđene zemlje, koji će sjebati i Vrelo Bune, i Vrelo Bunice, a obe rijeke skupa sa Bregavom svesti na žabokrečinu, dok će u Hutovom Blatu i Delti Neretve spustiti nivo vode, što će dozvoliti slanoj morskoj vodi da zaslani cijelo područje od Hutova do Delte sa svim ogromnim vrelima i podzemnim akvatorijem.

Ali ja se ne ljutim ako sumnjate u moju pogled na ove stvari – otkud znate koliko i šta ja znam – međutim, siguran sam da niko dovoljno inteligentan neče sumnjati u on što ima reči Braco Alikafić, čovjek koji je bio član grupe koja je isplanirala razvoj grada i okoline za potrebe ZOI’84, i koji je bio jedan od važnijih umova i glasova u odlučivanju – on je napisao članak sa ovog linka, i sve što trebate znati o njemu i njegovim iskustvima ćete saznati ako ga pročitate vrlo pažljivo, podugačak je :

Planine koje su pojeli skakavci by Lidumil Braco Alikalfić

Ako pročitate članak shvatićete kako je bilo kada su odlučivali naučnici, trust mozgova koji je dumao i planirao mjesecima i godinama prije nego su počeli da grade, a kad su jednom odlučili i otpočeli gradnju radili su to jer su sastavili dugoročan plan. I opet nakon nekog vremena su počeli pronalaziti mnoge nedostatke i greške, koje se više nisu mogle ispraviti.
Ovo što radi Babin Isprdak i njegov stranački klan je ad-hock skrnavljenje prvorazrednog bh. resursa koji pripada svima nama, a ne samo SDA-u, Isprdku, Berilu i bogatim Arapima – ovo je bezobzirno pljačka, prodaja gole zemlje !
To je apokaliptično otimanje životnog prostora i resursa, otimanje budućnosti naših potomaka.

Volio bih da vas što više pročita ovaj Alikafićev tekst, u međuvremenu pozdrav svima i hvala na podršci.

 

 

Communities Facing Expulsion – Live Blog

Thousands of people – residents of dozens of Palestinian communities located throughout Area C, the West Bank – face imminent expulsion by Israeli authorities on a variety of pretexts. The live blog will pool the regular updates we get from B’Tselem field researchers regarding the communities and any attempts by authorities to expel them. Click on the number of a community cluster and then on the tent icon marked on the map for further information about communities facing the risk of expulsion.

The information in the blog reflects the latest state affairs known to us and is updated as we receive new data from the field. For more on the communities facing expulsion, click here.

Source: Communities Facing Expulsion – Live Blog

E-mail za Al Jazeera Balkans povodom skandalozne epizode emisije “Kontakt” od 17. novembra ’16

Podrži istinu:
btselem.org | jewishvoiceforpeace.org | mikopeled.com

Ja nisam rasist !
OK, jesam bijel, ali imam nekoliko prijatelja crnaca, s kojim igram košarku svaki vikend, a s jednim crncem iz komšiluka radim na istom radnom mjestu, pa se svaki dan zajedno vozimo na posao, i družimo na pauzi.
Ne ja nisam Islamofob !
OK, nisam musliman, ja sam kršćanin, ali imam nekoliko prijatelja muslimana, što u komšiluku, što na poslu. S jednim se i često družim a on popije i pivo sa mnom.

Kada se predstavljaju upravo ovakav uvod se često čuje od ljudi koji u nastavku razgovora žele braniti svoje neobranjive rasističke i/ili Islamofobne teze.

I upravo u tom stilu je u sinoćnjoj emisij Kontakt, na Al Jazeera Balkans, započeo svoje branjenje neobranjivih teza zagrebački pro-izraelski rasist i Islamofob, Boris Havel, navodni stručnjak za “Arapsko-izraelski sukob: religija, politika i povijest Svete zemlje”, što je i naslov njegove knjige.
Za nadati se je da mu je to prvo i posljednje predstavljanje na nekom od balkanskih mainstream media.

Ko nam formira javno mjenje ? Svako ima pravo na mišljenje, svako ima pravo da izrazi to mišljenje, ali je nedopustivo da nečije mišljenje, izrečeno na valovima respektabilne mediske organizacije, u toku samo nekoliko minuta, bez skrutiniziranja, postane utvređena istina.

Emisija Kontekst na Al Jazeera Balkans:
– Boris Havel, Zagreb, docent na Fakultetu političkih znanosti, autor knjige “Arapsko-izraelski sukob: religija, politika i povijest Svete zemlje”;
– Slobodan Janković, Beograd, naučni saradnik u Institutu za međunarodnu politiku i privredum;
Mohammad Hamad, u Sarajevo, Udruženje palestinske dijaspore u Bosni i Hercegovini, predsjednik Centra za balkanske i bliskoistočne studije;
– voditelj Saša Delić.

E-mail za Al Jazeera Balkans (primjedbe@aljazeera.net) povodom emitiranja skandalozne epizode emisije “Kontakt” u srijedu, 17. novembra ’16:

Emisija “Kontakt” (od 17. novembra 2016) naprosto je neviđen skandal. Takvom ju je učinio jedan od sugovornika, Boris Havel iz zagrebačkog studija, ali i sam (urednik)/voditelj, Saša Delić, koji ili nije bio svjestan najrigidnijeg rasizma u obzervacijama i zaključcima zagrebačkog sugovornika, ili je u emisiju ušao potpuno nespreman, zbog čega su Havelove izjave prolazile neosporene, čak i kada je ovaj navodio neprovjerljive ili potpuno izmišljene informacije i opisivao nepostoječe pojave.
Havel je bio pristrasan, što samo po sebi nije zabranjeno, ali je skandalozno dozvoliti da se vaša ugledna medijska organizacija koristi kao platforma za obzervacije, zaključke i iznošenje pogleda iskrivljenih najprimitivnijim rasističkim refleksima: guranje stotina etničkih grupa i desetina nacionalnih identiteta s prostora Sjeverne Afrike i Bliskog Istoka pod jedno ime – arapi – samo zato što pripadaju arapskom civilizacijskom krugu, odnosno govore Arapski jezik i pripadaju, manje ili više, arapskoj kulturi. Vaš je gost uporno nazivao Palestince arapima, što je eklatantan izraz rasističkog pojednostavljivanja i predrasude, u najgorem maniru poistovječivanja, na primjer, Amerikan-ca-ke afričko-američkog porijekla i nekog, recimo, afrikan-ca-ke iz Nigerije nazivajući ih jednostavno “crncima”; ili, da se okrenemo bliže kući, kao da kažemo kako je gost iz Zagreba “slaven”, umjesto Hrvat, itd.
Njegove obzervacije o politici Izraela i PLO-a, te problemima života i smrti na okupiranim prostorima Palestine, koje je “argumentirao” u duhu advokata najradikalnije izraelske desnice, bile su u domenu voditeljske spremnosti i poznavanja materije, koji je trebao biti u stanju osporiti neke od skandaloznih Havelovih izmišljotina: poput navodnih dvostukih pravnih sistema u zemljama u izraelskom okruženju, gdje, tvrdi rasista iz Zagreba, “jedni zakoni važe za Muslimane, a drugi za ne-Muslimane” – koje su to zemlje i koji zakoni, on nam ne govori, ali ni Saša Delić ne nalazi za važno pitati ga za konkretan primjer takve diskriminacije – treba li reči da takvi primjeri ne postoje;
zatim, perfidna insinuacija kroz uporabu nacističkog vokabulara kako bi se nekako Palestince, a valjda i Muslimane tog dijela svijeta, dovelo u vezu s duhom anti-Semitizma i holokaustom – međutim, to je njegovo pravo, da daje takve obzervacije i bira vokabular, ali je i prerogativ voditelja da stane u kraj nepristojnom podmetanju;
mnogo štetnije od ovog perfidnog podmetanja je perfidno podmetanje u opravdavanju izgradnje nelegalnih kolonija na okupiranoj zemlji – da bismo znali da se radi o eklatantnom gaženju palestinskih ljudskih i svih drugih prava nije nam potreban zagrebački advokat Tel Aviva, sve sa svojim obzervacijama glede nepostoječeg “prava na postojanje države Izrael” – svi znamo da se izrealska politika gradnje kolonijalnih naselja na okupiranoj teritoriji kosi s međunarodnim pravom, te da su sve relevantne međunarodne institucije osudile ovu praksu kroz bezbroj rezolucija, samo nam rasist iz Zagreba preko vaše cijenjene kuće podmeće nekakvo svoje opravdavanje, s tim da nikako ne zaboravlja da za sve probleme otvoreno optuži Palestince, nazivajući njihove aktivnosti isključivo ili terorizmom ili prevarama – kako i dolikuje jednom politički, etnički i vjerski pristrasnom rasistu.
Jedino što možete uraditi, i za nas gledaoce i za dobro vašeg ugleda, je da ne reprizirate današnji (17. nov.’16) Kontekst !
U nadi da će te se osvrnuti na moju primjedbu pa možda, eventualno, donijeti odluku da spornu emisiju više ne emitirate, srdačno vas pozdravljam.

Još se moglo navesti nekoliko primjera, poput Havelove insinuacije da buduća palestinska država ne mora biti “Judenfrei“.
Jer eto, zaboga, ti podli “arapi” mrze Jevreje i ne žele da žive s njima. Zaboravio je, zamislite, ovaj navodni poznavalac “povjesti Svete Zemlje” da Muslimani i Jevreji u palestini žive zajedno od pojave Islama pa sve do 1946 godine, znači jedno hiljadu i pol godina, kada je stvoren cionistički rasni raj, i full-scale  aparthejd – država Izrael.
Osim perfidnog pokušaja da se poveže palestinski stav prema (nacionalnoj državi) Izraelu, ali i muslimanski općeniti stav prema Jevrejima generalno, s nacističkom (treba li reči i ustaškom) ideologijom i zločinima iz II svjetskog rata, i još i više sa savremenim anti-Semitizmom, ova podla podvala ima i praktičnu dimenziju: zasniva se na Havelovoj tezi da izraelci ova nova naselja na okupiranoj teritoriji – koja grade i.s.k.lj.u.č.i.v.o za jevrejske doseljenike iz Rusije i drugih djelova Evrope (npr. Francuske), te Sjeverne Amerike – ustvari namjeravaju svojevoljno prepustiti budućoj palestinskoj državi skupa s ovim doseljenicima.
Nevjerovatno – da nije smrtno-tragično bilo bi cinično !
Ovako pokvarenu maštu nemaju čak ni najradikalniji izraelski političari, intelektualci, a ni propagandisti, kojim nikad nije palo niti će pasti na pamet da kažu kako ova ilegalna kolonijalna naselja grade kako bi vjersko-etničku sliku buduće palestinske države učinili malo više multi-kulti.
Nešto ovako podlo može se, izgleda, zakotiti samo u poganom umu jednog prizemnog balkanskog rasiste i Islamofoba.

Naravno, u studiju u Sarajevu, skupa s voditeljom Sašom Delićem, imali smo priliku slušati i palestinsku stranu priče, samo što je ovaj gost, Mohammad Hamad, bio u prilično podređenom položaju u odnosu na drugu dvojicu. Čovjek je Palestinac, i u emisiji je govorio arapskim jezikom !
Dakle, gledaoci i slušaoci nisu mogli da ga razumiju, što, naravno, nije slučaj sa sugovornicima iz Zagreba i Beograda.
Logično studio je uveo prevodioca u razgovor, što je uvijek, bez obzira na kvalitet prevoda, degradirajuće za snagu argumenata i općeg utiska. U slučaju današnje emisije sve oko prevoda je bilo očajno loše: prevodioc je bio grozno loš u simultanom prevođenju, ton i jačina prevodiočeva izlaznog signala je bila takva da se njegov glas preklapao s glasom gosta, itd – dakle, malo šta se moglo razlučiti iz ove dvoglasne kakofonije, zbog čega je Hamadov uticaj na formiranje mjenja o konkretnoj temi morao biti zanemarljiv.

donkey-is-also-a-scientist

deGrasse is annoying! Who would have thought – but nobody complains about his Islamophobic rants for New Atheists chorus, though

Neil deGrasse Tyson: pedantry in space

by Sam Kriss

Something terrible happened to you in outer space. All you can remember are the last few moments, the sun fading to a speck as you and your crew broke free from the solar system, the ship’s systems suddenly shutting down, the panic and blackness inside, shouting and sobbing, outside the phosphorescent fringes of the wormhole as it opened up in front of you – and then you woke up, sweat-slick in your own bed at sunrise, with the birds singing outside, in another universe. You are trapped in the world of the popular TV astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson, and you know this, because here the sunrise isn’t a sunrise at all. In fact, the earth is a sphere orbiting the sun, so the sun does not in any sense actually ‘rise’ – it’s just that you happen to be positioned right on the moving line, known as the ‘terminator’, that separates the illuminated portion of the planet from its dark side. And the birds singing aren’t really singing – actually, they’re just emitting a series of noises without any of the tonal qualities that distinguish singing from other vocal emissions. And the bed isn’t yours, because scientists have never been able to find any way of isolating ‘ownership’ in the physical composition of any object. You jump out of bed and start banging frantically at the walls. Is there no way out? Where are your crew? You rush to the window, and almost collapse in horror. It’s all there, spread out in front of you, exactly like home: everything is exactly the same, but in this sick parody of a universe it’s all been twisted into something hollow, meaningless, and mercilessly dull.

Pink strands of cloud fizzle up from the horizon, and you know that actually the horizon is just the curvature of the earth, and that the clouds, which were once believed to be inhabited by angels, house nothing of the sort. A few people are already outside in the streets below you, jogging, going to work, but they’re not really people. Actually, they’re just apes of the family Hominidae, most closely related to the genus Pan, going about their ape-business, which remains primarily motivated by the ape-needs of food, shelter, and sex. There is nothing that isn’t instantly boring. It’s too much. You rush into the kitchen, rattling the drawer in sheer panic (actually just dyspnea, tachycardia and dilation of the pupils caused by a surge of epinephrine in your body), pull out the knife (actually just a piece of metal attached to a piece of wood), and open your wrists. The blood (which was once thought to be one of the four humours, governing personality traits, but which is actually primarily used to transmit oxygen) glugs out, darker in colour and slower than you’d expected. It’ll be over now, you think. But actually, you’re not dying: you’re just a collection of atoms, and every single one of those atoms will remain. Not only are you in this universe, this universe is in you.

Neil deGrasse Tyson is, supposedly, an educator and a populariser of science; it’s his job to excite people about the mysteries of the universe, communicate information, and correct popular misconceptions. This is a noble, arduous, and thankless job, which might be why he doesn’t do it. What he actually does is make the universe boring, tell people things that they already know, and dispel misconceptions that nobody actually holds. In his TV appearances, puppeted by an invisible army of scriptwriters, this tendency is barely held in check, but in his lectures or on the internet it’s torrential; a seeping flood of grey goo, paring down the world to its driest, dullest, most colourless essentials. He likes to watch scifi films, and point out all the inaccuracies. Actually, lasers wouldn’t make any sound in space; actually a light year is a unit of space rather than time; actually, none of this is real, it’s just a collection of still images projected at speed to present the illusion of movement, and all the characters are just actors who have never really been into outer space. When the rapper B.o.B. started loudly declaring that there’s a vast conspiracy to hide that fact that the world is really flat, Neil deGrasse Tyson immediately jumped in to refute him, even featuring on a eye-stabbingly awful rap song insisting that ‘B.o.B. gotta know that the planet is a sphere, G’ – a passionate, useless, and embarrassing defence of the blindingly obvious. In a world that’s simply given, brute fact, any attempt to imagine it into an entirely different shape must be stamped out. Why? The subject-matter is cosmic and transcendental, the object-cause is petty and stupid. Neil deGrasse Tyson strides onto stage to say that actually the Earth orbits the sun, that actually living beings gain their traits through evolutionary processes, that actually your hand has five fingers, that actually cows go moo, that actually poo comes out your bum – and you are then supposed to think yes, I knew that, and imagine someone else, someone who didn’t know it already, some idiot, and think: I’m better than that person, I’m so much smarter than everyone else.

A decent name for this tendency, for stars and spaceships recast as the instruments of a joyless and pedantic class spite, would be I Fucking Love Science. ‘Science’ here has very little to do with the scientific method itself; it means ontological physicalism, not believing in our Lord Jesus Christ, hating the spectrally stupid, and, more than anything, pretty pictures of nebulae and tree frogs. ‘Science’ comes to metonymically refer to the natural world, the object of science; it’s like describing a crime as ‘the police,’ or the ocean as ‘drinking.’ What ‘I Fucking Love Science’ actually means is ‘I Fucking Love Existing Conditions.’ But because the word ‘science’ still pings about between the limits of a discourse that depends on the exclusion of alternate modes of knowledge, the natural world of I Fucking Love Science is presented as being essentially a series of factual statements. There are no things, there are only truths. The fact that the earth is a sphere is vast and ponderous: you stand on its grinding surface, as that fact carries you on its heavy plod around our nearest star. The fact that the forms of organic life emerge through Darwinian evolution is fractal and distributed, so that little fragments of that fact will bark at you in the street or dart chirping overhead. The fact that there is no God, being a negative statement, is invisible, but you know for certain that it’s out there.

Which is not to say that there’s any requirement that these facts be true. None of this is real. Those multicoloured nebulae are not real objects, they exist only in fantastic pictures overlaid with Neil deGrasse Tyson’s face and some vague sentiments about how wonderful the universe is when it’s very far away from human life.  The images are digitally stitched together, the colours are fake, the shapes are not anything that could actually be seen out the window of your spaceship, a real-life nebula is about as exciting as a damp fog. If you’re going to love the natural world, really Fucking Love it, it’s best that you know as little about it as possible, or it might start to seem less lovable. Like when Neil DeGrasse Tyson quipped that ‘if ever there were a species for which sex hurt, it surely went extinct long ago.’ It’s a perfect Tyson fact, true because it’s basically tautologous, its scientific quality having everything to do with the idea that actual phenomena are just instantiations of abstract laws, and nothing to do with any scientific observation, such as listening to the yelps of cats fucking at night, or to women. Or when his TV show Cosmos described the sixteeth-century astrologer Giordano Bruno as a martyr for science, executed by the Catholic church for proposing a heliocentric solar system. See how the idiots persecute us, the rational, with their superstition and their hostility to objective thought. The reality – that Bruno believed in magic, worshipped the ancient Egyptian god Thoth, and was executed not for heliocentrism but for denying the divinity of Christ – is ignored, because that isn’t Fucking Science Love. Or when he decided that ‘Italy valued cathedrals while Spain valued explorers. So worldwide, five times as many people speak Spanish than Italian.’ A spurious reconstruction of the past from present conditions, or the I Fucking Love Scientific theory of history: successful tribes were populated by little atavistic Carl Sagans; if Italians didn’t slaughter millions in the New World it isn’t because the peninsula was at the time fractured into multiple city-states (some of them occupied by, uh, Spain) which supplied significant amounts of capital rather than colonists, it’s because they weren’t interested in spaceships.

But all this is pedantry, the perverse insistence on how the world is, the total apathy to how it could be different. Pedantry could be broadly defined as a hostility to metaphor, the demand that every object stand for itself and nothing else, that words function in the same way as numbers. Which is why it’s pointless to criticise Neil deGrasse Tyson or the I Fucking Love Scientists for being the pompous, self-important, and utterly cretinous pedants that they are: it’s just falling back into their own dismal, boring logic, insisting that a thing is what it is rather than something else. It won’t help you, lying dazed on the lino, the blood now spluttering in half-congealed dribs from your arms, running diagonally to the corner of the room, where the cat is skittishly starting to lap it up with tiny flicks of its tongue. You lie there, and you try to remember if you ever did really go into outer space. It was so black out there, you remember. And all the stars were so far apart.

reblogged from: Idiot Joy Showland

stereotypical-image-angry-disobedient-arab-savage-swinging-sabre-eternal-arab-against-white-intellectual-superiority

Debunking the “Islam is Not a Race!” Argument – Muslim Reverie

by October 15, 2011

Reblogged from:
https://muslimreverie.wordpress.com/2011/10/15/debunking-the-islam-is-not-a-race-argument/

Islamophobes think they have it all figured out.  After they read the works of anti-Muslim pseudo-intellectuals and propagandists, they become self-proclaimed “experts” on Islam.  The message they absorb from their favorite Islamophobe stars can be easily summarized as: “Islam is evil and must be wiped off the face of the Earth.  Furthermore, every single Muslim on the planet is plotting to take over the West (read: world) and any Muslim who claims otherwise is lying. Yes, this includes your Muslim friends, who you shouldn’t be friends with anyway.”

I’ve seen some Islamophobes embrace the term “Islamophobia” because they proudly admit being fearful of Islam. “Yes,” they say, “We are afraid of Islam, which is why we want it destroyed.”  Dang.  Geert Wilders has never been shy in stating he wishes for the Qur’an to be banned (Nazi-style) and for Muslims to be massively expelled from the West (Spanish Inquisition-style). Clearly, these views are appalling, dangerous, and racist.  However, as odd as it may sound (at least to people who abhor racism and oppression) Islamophobes justify their racism by claiming they are not racist.  Hence, the argument, “Islam is not a race.  I cannot be racist.”

I’ve lost count of how many times I’ve heard Islamophobes and some well-intentioned non-Muslims make this argument whenever Islamophobia is addressed. The purpose, of course, is to derail conversations about Islamophobia and racism.  I’ve noticed the pattern of this response for quite a long time in workplaces, classrooms, on internet forums and blogs, etc.  You can picture the scenario involving an Islamophobe telling a Muslim that “all terrorists are Muslim.”  The Muslim person is insulted and calls the remark “racist.”  The Islamophobe steps up into the Muslim’s face and says, “It’s not racist!  Islam is not a race, idiot!”  He turns around and walks away, claiming victory for himself and starts high-fiving his buddies, who are like, “Oh man, you are so effing awesome!  You shut that Mozlem down!”

I wonder how Islamophobes expect Muslims to react after they make this pathetic argument.  Are we supposed to look surprised and realize, “Oh my God, Islam is not a race?  Really?  You mean I’ve been practicing Islam this whole time and didn’t know it was a religion?”  Yes, thank you, Captain Obvious, we know full well that Islam is not a race.  We know Islam, like any religion, is open to people of all racial backgrounds, including to those who are white (*gasp*).  However, what is also true is that Islam is racialized by the ideology of white supremacy, which means Muslims are cast as threatening racial Others. Take some time to understand this. The key word here is racialization, where racial characteristics and racist attitudes are assigned to groups and religions that are not races. No, Islam is not a race, but it is constructed as a race and the manner in which it is demonized is an extremely racial process.

In her book “Casting Out: The Eviction of Muslims from Western Law and Politics,” Sherene Razack describes the process of race thinking, which is a “structure of thought that divides up the world between the deserving and the undeserving according to descent.” Within the context of Muslims in settler states such as the US and Canada, Razack explains that race thinking is articulated when presidents and prime ministers of white-majority nations talk of the “American values” or “Canadian values” they are defending in the “war on terror.” Reinforced in this narrative is the notion of “culture clash,” which emphasizes on cultural difference between “the European majority and the Third World peoples (Muslims in particular).”  Since “culture clash” focuses on cultural difference and racism, white societies declare the “superiority of European culture,” which is “imagined as homogenous composite values,” by triggering stereotypical associations with Muslim-majority countries (Razack uses “the veil, female genital mutilation, arranged marriages” as examples of these associations). Reproducing this duality of “us versus them” where “the West has values and modernity and the non-West has culture,” Muslims are easily marked as racial Others that are antithetical and inherently opposite to the West. As Razack explains, “cultural difference, understood as their cannibalism, their treatment of women, and their homophobia, justifies the savagery that the West metes out.”

We see this sharp contrast in mainstream western media representations of Islam and Muslims.  Muslim men are consistently seen as dangerous brown-skinned and bearded men holding assault rifles, rioting in the streets, shouting “Allahu akbar,” and burning an American or Israeli flag.  Through this same lens, Muslim women are seen as veiled, oppressed, and sometimes dangerous, but also as victimized bodies that need to be rescued by western imperialist intervention. Through this racialization process, racism surfaces to demonize Islam and Muslims and treats them as “threats” that need to be exterminated. Razack, drawing upon Michel Foucault, states that “racism enables us to live with the murderous function of the state and to understand killing of Others as a way of purifying and regenerating one’s own race.”  In order for racism to function this way, race thinking must unite with bureaucracy, i.e. when “it is systematized and attached to a project of accumulation, it loses its standing as a prejudice and becomes instead an organizing principle.”  As Foucault articulates:

The fact that the Other dies does not mean simply that I live in the sense that his death guarantees my safety; the death of the Other, the death of the bad race, of the inferior race (or the degenerate, or the abnormal) is something that will make life in general healthier: healthier and purer.

Razack elaborates on how systematized racism against Muslims operates:

In our time, one result is a securitized state in which it is possible to know that ‘the passenger who has ordered a special meal is non-smoking Muslim in seat 3K’ and to arrange for that passenger’s eviction from the aircraft. Racial distinctions become so routinized that a racial hierarchy is maintained without requiring the component of individual actors who are personally hostile towards Muslims. Increasing numbers of people find themselves exiled from political community through bureaucratic processes in which each state official can claim, as did Adolf Eichmann about arranging the transport of Jews to Nazi Germany, that he was only doing his duty. In the ‘war on terror’, race thinking accustoms us to the idea that the suspension of rights is warranted in the interests of national security.

Captured in the phrase ‘they are not like us’, and also necessarily in the idea that ‘they’ must be killed so that ‘we’ can live, race thinking becomes embedded in law and bureaucracy so that the suspension of rights appears not as a violence but as the law itself. Violence against the racialized Other comes to be understood as necessary in order for civilization to flourish, something the state must do to preserve itself. Race thinking, Silverblatt reminds us in her study of the Spanish Inquisition, usually comes clothed in an ‘aura of rationality and civilization.’

Indeed, by making demonization of racialized Others an organizing principle and social norm in mainstream media and politics, as well as asserting that white-dominated societies are “more rational” and “deserving,” the atrocities and brutalities committed by the west are conveniently erased.  We can see how systematic race thinking is to the white supremacist settler state when ongoing genocide against Native peoples is made possible through established laws and accepted norms that Native communities are “vanishing.”  After all, the United States could not exist without the genocide of Native peoples.  Since 1492, white colonialists and settlers demonized Natives as “savages” and by the mid-1800s, they declared “Manifest Destiny,” which perpetuated the belief that the United States not only had the right to expand their culture and steal land, but was also destined to. As indigenous scholars and activists have pointed out, the message was/is clear: Natives must be killed so that white settlers can live. Maythee Rojas adds: “This concept of white supremacy and domination became actively employed to remove people from their lands and force them to assimilate to a Euro-American society. As a result, physical bodies became a primary target.”

It is this legacy of colonialism, imperialism, and genocide that continues today, not only within white supremacist societies in North America and Europe, but also in its wars against Muslim-majority countries.  After 9/11, the Bush administration reproduced the idea that Western Christian values are  “superior” to non-Western culture by propagating the idea that the US was attacked because “we are free.”  Former vice president Dick Cheney confidently stated on national television that Iraqis were going to greet invading and occupying American soldiers as “liberators.”  Under the Obama administration, war and occupation in Afghanistan advances while drone attacks have killed over a thousand in Pakistan.  As racist war propaganda dehumanizes Muslims and Islam, US soldiers bomb, shoot, torture, and rape Iraqi, Afghan, and Pakistani bodies.  As racist discourse about Islam grows (i.e. it is a “violent,” “misogynistic,” “oppressive,” and “backwards” religion), mainstream white feminist groups took the opportunity to express their support for the war in Afghanistan, claiming that US invasion would “liberate” Afghan women.  The American soldiers murdering and raping Iraqi and Afghan women not only contradicts these claims, but also points to a disturbing reality of sexual violence being integral to war and colonialism.  As Andrea Smith reminds us, “If sexual violence is not simply a tool of patriarchy but also a tool of colonialism and racism, then entire communities of color are victims of sexual violence.”

It is significant to draw connections to the way demonization of Muslims leads to such sexual violence and brutality by Western occupying forces in Muslim-majority countries.  Muslim lands are considered “dirty,” “backwards,” and “hostile,” making the land violable.  Muslim men must be killed while the racialized bodies of Afghan or Iraqi women, like their land, become violable for Western masculinist power and possession. That is, since Muslim women are oppressed, who better to save victimized and racialized women from culture than the “civilized European” who represents “values” and “modernity”?  Razack explains:

Saving Brown women from Brown men, as Gayatri Spivak famously put it, has long been a major plank in the colonial ship since it serves to mark the colonizer as modern and civilized and provides at the same time an important reason to keep Brown men in line through practices of violence. In the post-9/11 era, this aspect of colonial governance has been revitalized. Today it is not only the people of a small white village in Canada who believe that Muslim women must be saved. Progressive people, among them many feminists, have come to believe in the urgency of saving Muslim women from their patriarchal communities. As a practice of governance, the idea of the imperilled Muslim woman is unparalleled in its capacity to regulate. Since Muslim women, like all other women, are imperilled in patriarchy, and since the rise of conservative Islam increases this risk (as does the rise of conservative Christianity and Hinduism), it is hard to resist calls to ‘save the women.’

Muslim women are not the property of Muslim men, therefore the imperialist notion that Muslim women need to be saved suggests they are helpless and don’t have a mind of their own. This is not to downplay the sexist oppression and misogyny Muslim women endure and fight against in Muslim-majority countries, but rather to point out the misogyny inherit in colonial savior fantasies.  Meanwhile, Muslims living in North America and Europe are marked as threatening racial Others that need to be stigmatized, profiled, incarcerated, put under surveillance, etc. Since the settler state determines who belongs and who doesn’t, and who must live and who must die, immigrants of color, as Smith argues, “generally become targeted as foreign threats, particularly during war-time.”  She adds, “Orientalism allows the United States to defend the logics of slavery and genocide as these practices enable it to stay ‘strong enough’ to fight these constant wars… For the system of white supremacy to stay in place, the United States must always be at war.”

At this point I would imagine the Islamophobe getting impatient and not buying this whole “racialization” business.  I’ve tried to explain this several times to people who have left such comments on my blog: “Race has nothing to do with religion, nothing to do with Islam.”  Most of the time, there is no response from these commenters, but when there is a reply, it’s typically a childish ad homimen attack. “You’re a moron, Islam is not a race, dammit!” they shout while (probably) jumping in the air and stomping the ground out of frustration.  Aside from the sources I’ve cited to counter their argument and personal experiences with Islamophobia, I remember how I saw this play out at a talk.  Earlier this year, I was one of two guest speakers at a local university hosting an event on Islamophobia in the West.  When a room about 40-50 students were asked to write down what first came to mind when they heard the words “Muslim man,” the responses were consistent with the racialization I discussed above.  Non-Muslim students wrote the following: “Arabic,” “turban,” “Middle Eastern,” “dark-skinned,” “beard,” “violent,” “aggressive,” “controlling,” “prayer rug,” “terrorist,” etc.  When they were given the same instructions for the words “Muslim woman,” they answered: “Veiled,” “headscarf, “oppressed,” “brown,” “shy,” “obedient,” “religious,” “serious,” “exotic,” etc.

See what’s happening here? What became clear from the responses was that non-Muslims associated Muslim men and women with racialized stereotypes. When it was my turn to speak, it was interesting how some of the non-Muslims made flying carpet fallacies and weren’t disturbed by the Islamophobia in the west.  When some students told me later that they didn’t think my use of the word “racism” was appropriate because, um, “Islam is not a race, dammit!” I reminded them of the racialized stereotypes they assigned to Muslim men and women. A Muslim can be black, brown, white, etc., but look at the attitudes about Muslims; look at the discourse surrounding them and their faith; look at how they and Islam are so politicized; look at the racial language that is used to describe Muslims.

Yes, Islam is not a race, but the mainstream discourse and perception of Islam and Muslims in media, politics, and law casts Muslims as racial Others. Having said that, when Islamophobes try to derail a conversation about Islamophobia by arguing “Islam is not a race,” they are also dismissing how oppressive power structures and hierarchies operate in the white supremacist societies.

It is no exaggeration to say that the “Islam is not a race” argument is a dangerous one. It works to legitimize state racism, particularly the racist laws and policies, surveillance programs, and imperialist wars that continue to target Muslims both in the west and in Muslim-majority countries. Islamophobes make this argument because they want to legitimize Islamophobia, and what better way to justify something than trying to convince people that the oppressive attitudes, behaviors, policies, and wars you advocate are “not racist”?

Demonizing Islam

Demonizing Islam

duhom-protiv-tiranije-autor-pero-marijanovic

Duh sa sjekirom iz hercegovačkog Darkwooda

“Nadahnuti” Luka Goluža nam iz Kanade priča priču o “duhu” Hercegovine, u rubrici “Duhom protiv tiranije” na web portalu rb-donjahercegovina.ba (postoji i knjiga kao kompilacija članaka  iz ove rubrike, ili obratno, koga briga!), a kroz koju se čitateljima serviraju bapske priče kao povjesne, koje se, kao, nastoje “otrgnuti od zaborava”, dok uglavnom vračaju čitaoca u mrak srednjeg vijeka i ispunjavaju tjeskobom, prezirom i mržnjom, koji su usmjereni na savremenike komšije-susjede Bošnjake i muslimane, kroz priče iz rubrike nazivanim Turci, poturčenjaci, izmišljeni narod, itd – wow, huuuh, exhilarating !
Evo kako “mali” Luka Goluža zamišlja “duh” valjda jednog podneblja – koje je doduše, “vjerovali ili da”, i samo vrlo jasno etno-religijski rasistički ograničeno: na “duh” i “tiraniju”; na “hrabre” kršćanke-hrvatice te “pedofilne” i “razvratne” muslimane-poturčenjake. Čista nauka & pure reason…

sjekira-kao-duh-snaga-islamofobnog-i-rasistickog-duha-screenshot-rb-donjahercegovina-ba-2016-10-05

Duh sa sjekirom iz hercegovačkog “Darkwooda” – not to be confused with stereotypical racist “Tamni Vilajet”

  • Sorry za svu silu “navodnika”, drugačije nije moglo….

 

The Crimes of Shimon Peres

Excellent interview with Miko on the career of Israeli ex-president and war criminal Shimon Peres, who passed away recently and was prised as peacemaker genius by US and European leaders at the funeral – Miko’s interview here is less then 10 minutes long but very concise and to the point !

Miko Peled

On September 28, Miko spoked RT’s Afshin Rattansi about Shimon Peres’ legacy as the architect of illegal Israeli settlements and as the man who brought nuclear weapons to the Middle East.

View original post